Lucifer the Goddess
Written by Goro, June 5, 2019
This might be a good time to clarify something…
This is not really Lucifer.

This is Lucifer.

This is not really Lucifer.

This is Lucifer.

Lucifer is the goddess.

Lucifer is the light bearer.

Lucifer is the Morning Star.

Lucifer is even… Jesus?

Revelation 22:16: “I Jesus have sent my angel to you with this testimony for the churches. I am the root and the offspring of David, the bright morning star.”
+ – + – + – + – + – + – +
Here’s my point: Don’t let the name/word “Lucifer” scare you. Don’t let your brain automatically think “Satan!” when hearing the name “Lucifer”. Yes, it’s true and obvious that “Lucifer” has dark connotations, but these are largely artificial and forced associations added to what was originally nothing inherently dark or scary. Essentially Lucifer is the goddess, Venus, the feminine energy. You know, the Virgin Mary, Magdalene, Isis, the Statue of Liberty, and such. You could even say Lucifer is the Holy Grail and vice versa.
When “Lucifer” is mentioned on Super Torch Ritual, it is usually done so in that esoteric/original context and spirit unless otherwise noted and not in the typical, artificial (and quite opposite) “Satanic” sense. Here on STR we are into knowledge (light), not some dark evil. [Note: I do actually often incorporate the traditional/artificial symbolism that identifies Lucifer as the fallen angel as that is at this point an unavoidable association solidly embedded in the collective consciousness, so much so even multicontextual communications from the reality matrix regularly utilize it as an overlay. ]
Placed in this proper context, many of the major multicontextual themes we’ve been dealing with this year suddenly become coherently connected and streamlined. The Da Vinci Code is all about the “sacred feminine” and the Holy Grail/Royal Blood of MM/VM as well as Gnosticism and the “underground stream” including the Priory of Sion and Knights Templar closely associated with goddess worshipping; the Statue of Liberty which we’ve highlighted quite extensively in the past month or so is a literal, female “light bearer” (Lucifer); and of course we’ve seemingly “made contact with Lucifer” this year. You can see that all these things are closely interrelated.
2019 is the year of Leonardo da Vinci’s “resurrection” 500 years after his death, the cycle of the phoenix. It can easily imply “Grail rebirth”, or interchangeably, “Lucifer rising”. “Atlantis rising” as well. And that’s what we’ve been witnessing this year in various world events.
The following is a quick explanation of the twisted history of the word “Lucifer”, the most concise one I could find yesterday (source here):
+ – + – + – + – + – + – +
[Start quote]
The Greek word for “star” is “aster.” Astarte comes from the same root. The Hebrew words for “morning star” are “helel shachar.” Shahar was the goddess of dawn in the pantheon of Ugarit; her twin brother was Shalim, which translated says “Ish-man of Elohim.” Both were associated with the planet Venus.
Astarte was one of the most popular of the goddesses in the Greco-Roman pantheon in the first century. According to mythology, she came to earth in a ball of fire – a meteor, a black stone. And in biblical Hebrew, “shachar” is translated as “black” as well as “shining.”
The Latin word for light is Luc; the Latin word for bearer is ferre. The planet Venus was known to the ancients as the “Light Bearer” because Venus appears in the sky each morning before the sun rises. In ancient Greco-Roman mythology Venus was the goddess of love, sexuality, and procreation. The goddess Venus, the “Light Bearer” was called Luc-ferre, or Lucifer in Latin.
Nowhere in the [Old Testament] or the [New Testament] is Lucifer identified with, or as, “Satan.” This misconception originated with Jerome and his Latin Vulgate translation from the Hebrew and Greek. Jerome used the word, Lucifer, to translate “Morning Star” at 2 Peter 1:19 (Greek word was phosphoros), and At Isaiah 14:12 (Hebrew word was Helel). Read in context, neither identifies “Lucifer” as “Satan.” Jerome translated “morning star,” (Greek aster) at Revelation 22:16 as stella, not Lucifer.
Jerome’s inconsistency in his use of “Lucifer” as Latin for “the morning star” speaks volumes. How could he have written, “I Jesus…am the root and the offspring of David, Lucifer”?
As with many words in scripture, the translators chose the word that supported their version of the texts. “Morning Star” or “Venus” was translated as “Lucifer” if the goal was to demonize, especially if the “demon” was the goddess of sexuality or the sect that identified itself as “Children of Light,” as did the Essenes and Nazarenes.
Revelation 22:17: “The Spirit and the Bride say, ‘Come.’ And let him who hears say, ‘Come.’ And let him who is thirsty come, let him who desires take the water of life without price.”
“The Church” claimed “the Spirit” was Jesus and “the Bride” was “the Church” – two entities. Revelation 22:16 has been translated as: “I am the root AND the descendant of David, the Bright Morning Star” – a single entity; unless the conjunction “and” was shifted a couple of spaces in translation. It makes more sense – and is more consistent – if 22:16 is translated: “I Am the root, the descendant of David, AND the Bright Morning Star” – two entities.
“The Spirit is Jesus; The Bride is The Bright Morning Star – Astarte, Asheroth, Venus – take your pick. The Bride was the Goddess.
It is noteworthy that when this verse is modified and the key words compared to Moses’ conversation with The Gods on the Mountain, the answers agree: “‘I AM’ in Biblical Hebrew is ANOKI. The Babylonian “First Parents” were An and Ki; adding “Prince” and “Princess,” Biblical Hebrew “sar, becomes Ansar and Kisar. Jesus said: “‘An and Ki, THE ROOT and THE STAR – God and Goddess.”
Both were attempting to bring the feminine principles – Compassion and Wisdom – back into their religion. They were also attempting to explain “Creation” in terms that coincide with modern science: It takes two cooperating forces to create matter. The Goddess must be resurrected if science and scripture are to ever be reconciled!
[End quote]
+ – + – + – + – + – + – +


